Request for you

[ido]

(09-24-2009 04:44 AM)649lotto player Wrote:  Hi Ido,

Up to now I didn't anything with pairs and my recommendation
for using most available distances 1 is simple a statistic view.

Hi 649lotto player,

this time my replay is late because I wanted to do the new post before.

About your simple statistic view it was clear to me from the begginning .
Sadly the statistic is famous to be the less precise one of the group of the precise sciences.

".....As soon as I'll have the time I will change my program and will
count the 48 distances availability in the past UK drawings.

The availability should fit to the total availability.
That means that the distance 1 also should be most available.

Therefore a pair of numbers with the distance 1 should
appear sooner at the next drawings than a pair of numbers
with a larger distance.

Because of this I think the chance to predict a pair of numbers
with the distance 1 is given more often, but clearly depends
of the prediction method......"

I confess to be a litle bit disoriented - you are mentioning the past
UK drawings -what we whith Mario (because Andreas not post any more??)
is related on the bookies Lottery 49's twice daily draw.It's me not to understand thath you are reffering to it too or what you mean is realy related to the UKNatonal Lottery?

Because:

"....At the moment I play with the skip strategy where I omit
the last 3 times 7 drawn numbers, which are mostly 18 numbers.

Then I use an optimised open wheel with 31 numbers with some lines
(12 or 24 or 36 or 48 lines) with the guarantee 3 if 5
(because one of the omitted 18 numbers will be drawn again)
and transpose it to 49 numbers.

With this method I should get the highest return with 3
right numbers.

But I still have to work out which of the past 18 drawn numbers
could be repeatet again, so that I don't omit it......"


1/if you realy play 31 numbers on 49's daily two draws ,this is a playstile
I'll never aprove,than I can give you for some time 12 numbers formations
for 4 right numbers,ones 5 ,never less than 3 and if you will like it ,I would
give to you the method description but there is an effort to do of you as it's based on the disgusting circonfernzial consecutivity

2/if you play National Lottery first visit this my new post:

http://www.lottopost.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?tid=540

may happen to give you some new idea+ there is a process I checkked on
about 10-12 consecutive UK draws and the result were good - again 12 numbers ,there was fourfold ,one 5+1 but its possible to make solid conclusions only if examine the hole amount of cases and this means a time.
I wanted immediatly to write to Frank about it but was skared to be ridiculous and he makes the skip method which I don't comprend.
Today I read your firs post of presentation ,if you can write a program maybe you would be able to obtain all the method statistic and if I can have it maybe will have some idea about how to improve or how to do submethods.
The steps aren't to complicate ,there is an add/substractional fase +20/-20 in which the damn pair 49-1 is consecutive again but you won't be bodered if I do a table whith the numbers for transposition.
What I exactly wanted to bold is that for me playing 31 numbers is too drastyc way of investment.


shoise