Request for you

[649lotto player]

(09-22-2009 09:16 AM)ido Wrote:  Hi,Mario,

I kindly hope for you that you don't believe learning fishing is an easy thing.
........................
"...Then your analyses use storical max overdue and appeared same color and same ending digits...."
My analyses use a thousands of single(small&greate) parameters which I like to call "factors to respect" ,the bigest part consists of statistical data,but wath exactly the intuition is second you,just for mention one non statistical??
.........................
".....You say that is chronological overdue and 35-42 had 12 chronological overdue and 9 overdue in set of 15 pairs; how do you choose this set of 15 pairs and what it means 9 overdue? I know only 12 overdue for 35-42......"
I calculate the sets after any draw so they have the same number ,todays two have numbers 41&42.

Chronological overdue is the real,matematical overdue and 35-42 has already 14 now - method overdue is an abstraction ,it's a virtual cathegory -immagine yor last win was on 21.08.,than your next win have one month of overdue ,as it regards a time than any moment can be acsepted virtualy as initial,startpoint for an event.
In conclusion one set's overdue begins from the mother draw used for its creation ,ergo 35-42 has an overdue of 11 against 20.This pair is good ,if consider num.49 too,one good must be in strictly 4 draws.

"....How do you use your analytic table?
But which is the seeking principles for analytic table?....."

Before reading the post I link to,look at the immages,the analytic table
is simply one of numerous ways to expres the draw data ,gives the possibility to have lot of information at a glance ,the unique thing
to do is reading it.
The best way of reading is to have a serios statistic knoleage for the Lottery in question .

http://lottopost.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?tid=445

..................................

Hi Ido,

since I locked in here I was not very sucessful with prediction or
deleting numbers for the next draw.
Therefore I didn't post anything.
With interest I followed the postings of your method
to predict pairs of numbers for the next drawing.


Because you prefer the distance of seven for your pairs,
I counted the availability of all possible 48 distances within
the 14.983.816 combinations and found that the most
available distance for pairs is one and not seven.

Therefore I think you would have higher chances with
pairs with the distance one than with pairs with the
distance seven.

Here is my counting list with the availability of all 48 possible
distances.

E.g. 1-2 has the distance 1 ( the lowest possible
distance, mostly available).

1-49 has the distance 48 (the highest possible distance,
least available).

The distance 7 is 1.070.190 times less available than the
distance 1 and therefore it will be less times drawn.

Also the distances 2 and 3 have a high availability.


649lotto player



Distance, Availability (within 14.983.816 lines)
1 8561520
2 8383155
3 8204790
4 8026425
5 7848060
6 7669695
7 7491330
8 7312965
9 7134600
10 6956235
11 6777870
12 6599505
13 6421140
14 6242775
15 6064410
16 5886045
17 5707680
18 5529315
19 5350950
20 5172585
21 4994220
22 4815855
23 4637490
24 4459125
25 4280760
26 4102395
27 3924030
28 3745665
29 3567300
30 3388935
31 3210570
32 3032205
33 2853840
34 2675475
35 2497110
36 2318745
37 2140380
38 1962015
39 1783650
40 1605285
41 1426920
42 1248555
43 1070190
44 891825
45 713460
46 535095
47 356730
48 178365


All 48 possible number combinations with the distance 1.

1 2
2 3
3 4
4 5
5 6
6 7
7 8
8 9
9 10
10 11
11 12
12 13
13 14
14 15
15 16
16 17
17 18
18 19
19 20
20 21
21 22
22 23
23 24
24 25
25 26
26 27
27 28
28 29
29 30
30 31
31 32
32 33
33 34
34 35
35 36
36 37
37 38
38 39
39 40
40 41
41 42
42 43
43 44
44 45
45 46
46 47
47 48
48 49