Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 3 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Number elimination
06-25-2009, 02:53 AM
Post: #1
Number elimination
Well before I was rudely interrupted in the other forum I was testing a number elimination system, which was attempting to capture a Lotto result within a reduced set of numbers, albeit a large set.
These are the numbers I posted for draw 1409..
1 5 6 7 9 11 12 13 15 16 19 20 21 22 23 25 26 27 28 30 31 33 34 35 37 38 39 42 44 45 47 49

By chance alone one can get about match 4 with 32 numbers, which on a full wheel would cover about 906,000 lines. Better than match 4 , preferably match 6 would show the system worked (in this example) by elimnating 17 numbers. We shall see how it goes on..Nerd
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
06-25-2009, 06:47 AM
Post: #2
RE: Number elimination
Frank Wrote:Well before I was rudely interrupted in the other forum I was testing a number elimination system, which was attempting to capture a Lotto result within a reduced set of numbers, albeit a large set.
These are the numbers I posted for draw 1409..
1 5 6 7 9 11 12 13 15 16 19 20 21 22 23 25 26 27 28 30 31 33 34 35 37 38 39 42 44 45 47 49

By chance alone one can get about match 4 with 32 numbers, which on a full wheel would cover about 906,000 lines. Better than match 4 , preferably match 6 would show the system worked (in this example) by elimnating 17 numbers. We shall see how it goes on..Nerd

Just 12 numbers eliminated would be great! I can usually win about
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
06-25-2009, 07:52 AM
Post: #3
RE: Number elimination
Well they matched 3, so nothing special there. The system learns as it goes along, so the trial continues..
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
06-27-2009, 12:26 AM
Post: #4
RE: Number elimination
Frank Wrote:Well they matched 3, so nothing special there. The system learns as it goes along, so the trial continues..
For 1410
1 2 4 5 6 8 11 12 13 14 18 20 21 23 24 28 29 30 33 35 36 37 40 41 42 43 46 48
Need match 4 or better with these 376,740 lines. Eliminated 21 numbers.
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
07-07-2009, 01:43 AM
Post: #5
RE: Number elimination
Just worked out why the system doesn't work. Doh ! Bonk
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
07-07-2009, 03:58 AM (This post was last modified: 07-07-2009 04:01 AM by Len.)
Post: #6
RE: Number elimination
Frank Wrote:Just worked out why the system doesn't work. Doh ! Bonk

Hi Frank
I've been looking at the draws in blocks of thirteen's.
15,17 & 48
were drawn
Sat 23/05/2009 - 1400 - 12, 17, 32, 41, 44, 48 BB 15
i.e. thirteen draws back.
I noticed you were looking at twenty draws back
and posted numbers.
"15,17,31,26,45,48"
15,45,48 being your best ones.

Thats why I went for numbers
15,17,45,48
lets hope they are drawn "Wednesday Draw No 1413"
Icon_smile

P.S.
What was up with the system?
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
07-07-2009, 10:15 AM
Post: #7
RE: Number elimination
Len Wrote:What was up with the system?

I don't know if I can explain it briefly, but I did some work for a guy called 888 on my other forum which created a table of counts of skips, over lotto history - where a skip was the number of draws between appearances of each ball. It showed that there were more skips of one draw than skips of two draws, more skips of two draws than skips of three draws and so on till there were zero or very few skips of 70 draws or more.

I knew there was something misleading about this information but couldn't quite put my finger on it, but went ahead and used it to create a table of numbers most likely to repeat. From the above table, last drawn and the one before featured highly in most cases. Using the bottom of the table was supposed to eliminate some numbers, but it wasn't successful.

I gave this a lot of thought and it dawned on me today that the table only counted ADJACENT skips with no appearances in between. For example..
Example ball 14 appeared in the draws below.

skip...... draw no.
..
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
07-07-2009, 07:47 PM (This post was last modified: 07-07-2009 07:49 PM by Len.)
Post: #8
RE: Number elimination
Hi Frank
Many thanks for explaining that Mate, it's much appreciated!
I'm looking at a similar way to yours,
Please see attached txt file.
I divide the numbers into blocks of thirteen
if you look at the ten blocks you will see
27,34,37,45,47,49 missed last time.

So are due anytime now?

Your way looks a lot better to me,
as it home's in on the numbers them selve's.
My way I'm just looking at numbers that miss,
or top numbers over so many draws.


Attached File(s)
.txt  13x10.txt (Size: 6.6 KB / Downloads: 675)
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
07-09-2009, 07:39 PM (This post was last modified: 07-09-2009 07:41 PM by Len.)
Post: #9
RE: Number elimination
Hi Frank
Your system did well in draw 1413
Numbers drawn were - 10,16,21,22,35,49, BB31
Your numbers
07 15 16 19 22 48

had 16 & 22
you were also in the right group's
for two others 15 & 19
as numbers 35 & 49 were drawn.
Keep up the good work Mate, your getting there!
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
07-09-2009, 09:14 PM
Post: #10
RE: Number elimination
Len Wrote:Hi Frank
Your system did well in draw 1413
Numbers drawn were - 10,16,21,22,35,49, BB31
Your numbers
07 15 16 19 22 48

had 16 & 22
you were also in the right group's
for two others 15 & 19
as numbers 35 & 49 were drawn.
Keep up the good work Mate, your getting there!

Well , I'm not at the finished version yet - still tweaking !Ylsuper
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Registration Agreement
Terms & conditions