Lotto 1439

[David]

Two tickets won the jackpot!

I find it hard to believe that someone would deliberately pick 26, 27 and 28 followed by 43, 45 and 46 - sounds more likely that the winning tickets were lucky dip tickets.

What are your views?

[dinski]

(10-08-2009 05:49 PM)David Wrote:  Two tickets won the jackpot!

I find it hard to believe that someone would deliberately pick 26, 27 and 28 followed by 43, 45 and 46 - sounds more likely that the winning tickets were lucky dip tickets.

What are your views?

Why not? As we are always being told, that combination is just as likely as any other.

This reminds me of Lotto 1366.

[David]

(10-08-2009 05:54 PM)dinski Wrote:  

(10-08-2009 05:49 PM)David Wrote:  Two tickets won the jackpot!

I find it hard to believe that someone would deliberately pick 26, 27 and 28 followed by 43, 45 and 46 - sounds more likely that the winning tickets were lucky dip tickets.

What are your views?

Why not? As we are always being told, that combination is just as likely as any other.

This reminds me of Lotto 1366.

Lotto 1435 is more appropriate as it also had three numbers in the twenties and forties with just one winning ticket!

I agree it is possible for any sequence of numbers to come up but some are highly improbable.

My feeling is to go for the numbers that are more likely plus one or two unlikely ones.

[Frank]

(10-08-2009 05:49 PM)David Wrote:  Two tickets won the jackpot!

I find it hard to believe that someone would deliberately pick 26, 27 and 28 followed by 43, 45 and 46 - sounds more likely that the winning tickets were lucky dip tickets.

What are your views?

I very nearly posted a thread about this myself. I had originally at first glance thought the result was 2 triplets 26-27-28 and 44-45-46 and was just about to post when I realised my mistake. It was a triplet and a doublet since 44 never came out but 43 did.
I agree that the combination is a typical lucky dip result as I've had similar lucky dips. Camelot usually reveal when a jackpot is won by a lucky dip, especially if the winner allows publicity so it will be interesting to see what is revealed.

[ido]

(10-08-2009 05:49 PM)David Wrote:  Two tickets won the jackpot!

I find it hard to believe that someone would deliberately pick 26, 27 and 28 followed by 43, 45 and 46 - sounds more likely that the winning tickets were lucky dip tickets.

What are your views?

Hi All,
I just was to open a thread named "Who remembers the last Draws of 2003"
and see you did the big work.
First the last draw was simply very beautyfull-the unbelievable
consecutive treble 26-27-28 had it's 4th appearance and the most
simple 43-45-46 appeared at firs time!It's oly the BB5 that i find funny but 5 is ever funny...

What I realy see important is that the numbers 46 &27was a part
of a new "summ pair " and after the draw 1439 they are again.I visit
the site "LotteryMerseyworld..." and knew that 46 ones appeared
in 4 consecutive draws .enter the pages to see that draws and leteraly
was knoked down -a triple deja vu!!!!!!!!!!!!!

1/leteraly a good part of the last draws's numbers
2/leteraly a good part of my "may happen today" list and
3/an event I'm expecting for a time and the time is quite over
regarding the main system about "after 6-36"

http://www.lottopost.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?tid=483

and even wou -two consecutive appearances of
the pair 27-46.See on yourselvs:




I did a file by the single file stamped on "LotteryMerseyworld..."
and dare to give an umile advice -full charge on the pair 27-46
for the draw 1440 ,what the poket would allow you ,the Christmas is near,
let's hope may be a bit more mery!There are a normal probabilities 50%/50% yes or no ,but the situation is
realy very,very strange..

Remembered about the fact that your Lottery machines are introduced in different periods and the end of 2003 somehow may coincide whith any of it
but don't have idea how to find info in matter of it...
Another hipothesys may be the ciclic frequensy ,I believe in it,far long away past periods represent fractioning its data ....c.t.???????

[ido]

(10-09-2009 02:19 AM)ido Wrote:  Remembered about the fact that your Lottery machines are introduced in different periods and the end of 2003 somehow may coincide whith any of it
but don't have idea how to find info in matter of it...
Another hipothesys may be the ciclic frequensy ,I believe in it,far long away past periods represent fractioning its data ....c.t.???????

This time Colombo get so curios that did
a real investigation.Here a link to the machine data
(menu a left)

http://www.lotterygen.co.uk/

In the file attached wath about the recent repeats
from the end of 2003

....por favor,it's not istigation to believe any conspirasy theories.
Any lottery drawing proccess is completely random!!!It's only me to be
so abnormaly curios about wath you in matter of all this machine was told...

[Frank]

(10-10-2009 08:02 PM)ido Wrote:  This time Colombo get so curios that did
a real investigation.Here a link to the machine data
(menu a left)

http://www.lotterygen.co.uk/

You know a class website whe you see one don't you Ido :

[ido]

(10-11-2009 11:46 PM)Frank Wrote:  You know a class website whe you see one don't you Ido :

Yes Frank,
I whish to enter it one day for 12-16 hours -maybe
in the next life or better after a particullary
capitalistic withdrawal....

[Pincho Paxton]

I did a ticket with three 20's, and three 40's so I suppose it is very likely that there would be 2 winners. I did in fact do many combination of 3 20's but not 26,27,28, so only won