Theres something about 18

[Frank]

Well after the Bulgarian fiasco, one can get paranoid, but have you noticed anything familiar about the UK Lotto results lately ?

For starters the quad 18,24,43,44 drawn in draw 1426 repeated to draw 1432 only 6 away, and then 18,34 repeated again on 1433 (from 1428) and then 18,20,43 has just repeated again from 2 draws ago!
The triple 2,28,35 has also repeated recently from only 2 draws before.
See attached table.

In fact a quick glance a the last 3 results and you have a feeling of Deja vu.

[Len]

(09-20-2009 09:07 PM)Frank Wrote:  Well after the Bulgarian fiasco, one can get paranoid, but have you noticed anything familiar about the UK Lotto results lately ?

For starters the quad 18,24,43,44 drawn in draw 1426 repeated to draw 1432 only 6 away, and then 18,34 repeated again on 1433 (from 1428) and then 18,20,43 has just repeated again from 2 draws ago!
The triple 2,28,35 has also repeated recently from only 2 draws before.
See attached table.

In fact a quick glance a the last 3 results and you have a feeling of Deja vu.

Hi Frank
I posted about that draw in thread
http://www.lottopost.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?tid=525
I knew there was something about number 18

[valelli]

does make you wonder doesnt it

[ido]

Hi,Len,Frank,Valelli,

There is not something about number 18 only.
I'd just created an immage for my replay to Frank's post
(As I'm a bulgarian citizen it's logical to feel involved)

The Bulgarian fiasco is more probable a dirty manipulation,
the investigation more ptobable will not have a concret result!!!
But if one realy adventure himself in the "Probability Jungle"
must admit that The Bulgarian fenomenon is not far more
unbelievable than wath the last 14 Draws of the UKLottery brot us:



The question is not if 14,28% of all 49 lottery numbers can
produce 17,64% of all 98 single numbers drawn in the period of
time-the question is how probable it is to happen this way!

NOTE:
...."The most interesting thing to me is that no one won the lottery the first week but a record 18 people won the second week

[Len]

Hi All
The analysis posted by ido
is what I am working on at the moment
I'm looking for numbers that are due
and what numbers they've been out with before.
i.e. triples or pair's

[dinski]

I noticed. First time I actually thought "perhaps the lotto isn't quite as random as we are always being told". I'm not a conspiracy theorist and don't think the lotto is rigged, however, I do think that there might be patterns in the lotto and that one day this pattern will be "unlocked" so that the lotto can be predicted. Sorry, I probably sound like loony but there goes...

[Frank]

[quote='ido' pid='2308' dateline='1253456396']
Hi,Len,Frank,Valelli,

Look at the immage bellow ,it seems more likely that playing the previous week

[ido]

[quote='Frank' pid='2323' dateline='1253616095']

Hi,Len,Frank,Valelli,

Look at the immage bellow ,it seems more likely that playing the previous week

[ido]

(09-21-2009 07:48 PM)Len Wrote:  Hi All
The analysis posted by ido
is what I am working on at the moment
I'm looking for numbers that are due
and what numbers they've been out with before.
i.e. triples or pair's

Hi Len and All,

I did some more attemptions and what i'm to do is
depositing a blok of 31 numbers as I think in the next 3-4
draws should be 5,5+1,6 or even 7 (met 7 too)
It's a proccess conditioned of a special pair appearance.
The only good I find is 7-27(Draw 1429) and I was
very astonished to realise that the defect exactly in the
drawmargine 1430-1435 is situated.So let us see:

(1-3-4-6-7-9
10-11-13-14-16-17
19-20-21-22-24-25
27-28-30-33-36-39
40-41-42-44-45-47
48)

It's not a system ,it's a group of 31 numbers I ordered in
increasing order.