+- Forums (http://lottopost.co.uk/forum)
+-- Forum: Lotteries (/forumdisplay.php?fid=29)
+--- Forum: UK Lotto 6-59 (/forumdisplay.php?fid=2)
+--- Thread: Repeat analysis (/showthread.php?tid=461)
RE: Repeat analysis - Len - 07-26-2009 04:17 PM
(07-24-2009 02:44 AM)Len Wrote: Hi Frank
I've noticed that digital ending's
in the thirty's go up next time they are drawn and in the twenty's go down,
from draw
Wed 22/07/2009 1417 - 2, 22, 23, 31, 35, 40 BB 20
Taking into account some previous digital endings, I get
possible numbers 03,10,11,13,21,30,32,42,45
looking at
Sat 16/05/2009 1398 - 1, 5, 9, 27, 42, 45 BB 21
I.E. twenty draws back
we have three numbers 21,42,45
I wonder if they will be drawn Saturday?
Having said that I've just noticed that
Wed 22/04/2009 1391 - 11, 21, 34, 42, 43, 45 BB20
number 20 come out, so could it repeat this time?
i.e. Giving us numbers.
20,21,42,45
Number 34 often comes out with number 20 so it too is possible?
Hi Frank
it looks like my list had Two numbers in Draw;1418
i.e. 30,32
1418 draw result was 08,17,30,32,38,40, BB04
P.S.
You were right about number 20 Mate.
I should have gone for number 30 as it was on my above list.
RE: Repeat analysis - Frank - 07-26-2009 10:51 PM
(07-24-2009 02:44 AM)Len Wrote: Hi Frank
it looks like my list had Two numbers in Draw;1418
i.e. 30,32
1418 draw result was 08,17,30,32,38,40, BB04
P.S.
You were right about number 20 Mate.
I should have gone for number 30 as it was on my above list.
Well done Len on your list having 2 numbers correct. I've explained what went wrong with mine in the number elimination thread, which uses repeat analysis to choose both a shortlist and an elimination list. I lost the toss and my elimination list became the 'bankers list'. Maybe I'll experiment with extending my scope to include 9 best skips and their asociated projected results for draw 1419, some will hit and some will miss - we shall see.
RE: Repeat analysis - Frank - 07-27-2009 01:50 AM
For 1419, I've used some interesting but distant skip values.
Skip
1238 draws
961
97
122
128
876
453
324
I haven't fully abandoned a skip of 20 which might reappear next time and go back into my list of interesting skips.
A skip of 1238 has done well over the past 7 draws, but had had 3 breaks over the past 14 draws. A bit scary when you think that draws from 10 years ago are being used here.
These create a banker list in order of.. 40,30,16,44......21, 27,28,45.....,9,10,12,23,42,48,49 (first 4 rated higher than the second 4 which are rated higher than the rest)
Eliminated....1,2,4,11,13,14,15,17,18,19,24,29,32,34,37,39,41,43,46,47
RE: Repeat analysis - Frank - 08-15-2009 07:16 PM
Using overdue repeat skips..........
The 3 worst runs of skips predicting draw 1424 are skips of 547,187 and 1192. lots of empty spaces in the repeats tables. They create a possible repeat pool of 17 numbers. Number 33 is indicated twice.
draw number..... skip..................... Result
877.......... 547 ..................... 10 22 28 33 37 39
1237......... . 187 ..................... 9 12 20 25 33 35
232........ .. 1192 ..................... 2 15 18 26 36 38
The elimination list created by this is too large, so I also mixed in some good runs of skips -all having consecutive runs of 5, hoped to go to 6 in the next draw. Having added good skips of 342,44,67,393 I ended up with a strongly eliminated list of :-
3 4 5 6 8 13 14 17 19 27 32 40 41 42 43 44 46 48
My bankers were :- 2,33,37 and runners up 9,10,15,25,31
RE: Repeat analysis - Len - 08-17-2009 01:52 AM
(08-15-2009 07:16 PM)Frank Wrote: Using overdue repeat skips..........
The 3 worst runs of skips predicting draw 1424 are skips of 547,187 and 1192. lots of empty spaces in the repeats tables. They create a possible repeat pool of 17 numbers. Number 33 is indicated twice.
draw number..... skip..................... Result
877.......... 547 ..................... 10 22 28 33 37 39
1237......... . 187 ..................... 9 12 20 25 33 35
232........ .. 1192 ..................... 2 15 18 26 36 38
The elimination list created by this is too large, so I also mixed in some good runs of skips -all having consecutive runs of 5, hoped to go to 6 in the next draw. Having added good skips of 342,44,67,393 I ended up with a strongly eliminated list of :-
3 4 5 6 8 13 14 17 19 27 32 40 41 42 43 44 46 48
My bankers were :- 2,33,37 and runners up 9,10,15,25,31
Hi Frank
I see 32,46 & 48 were drawn from your list.
RE: Repeat analysis - Frank - 08-17-2009 07:27 AM
(08-17-2009 01:52 AM)Len Wrote: Hi Frank
I see 32,46 & 48 were drawn from your list.
Yes Len, its starting to be consistent, the 'elimination list' contains 3 main balls within a list of 18, compared with the statistical expectation for random of 2.2 main balls. The three 'bad runs' of repeats (skip values of 187,547,1192 ) were hoped to end their bad run and have a match this time, actually they all missed yet again making them even more overdue to repeat next time. So once again the 'elimination list' contained some bankers.
RE: Repeat analysis - Frank - 08-18-2009 09:18 PM
For 1425, Im using bad repeat skip values of 547,187,1192,309 in the hope they will repeat in 1425 and also good 5 draw consecutive repeat skip values of 3, 189, 462, 838, 979 in the hope this will continue. In case you think the more recent skips are more relevant (and why not) I'm showing what a skip value of 3 is doing at the moment in the attached image.
Taking all the projected results into account (and applying a weighting factor to the numbers most overdue to repeat in each result ) my eliminated list now is..
2 11 14 15 16 18 19 23 24 27 28 30 37 38 41 42 43 44 45 48. Lets see if this list becomes a bankers list instead.
My actual favourites list is :- 8,31,46, 3,22,25,32,34,39. Red= highest rated, equal score. Blue= next rated, equal score
As the repeat analysis and number elimination threads use the same method and therefore overlap in their end result, I'll stick to this thread for any further discussions on number elimination. Maybe it should be called the "sticking my neck out" thread.
RE: Repeat analysis - Frank - 08-20-2009 09:58 AM
(08-18-2009 09:18 PM)Frank Wrote: my eliminated list now is..
2 11 14 15 16 18 19 23 24 27 28 30 37 38 41 42 43 44 45 48. Lets see if this list becomes a bankers list instead.
Result.......10,23,26,30,41,45 bonus 49
Match 4 again ! (compared with 2.45 for random selection of 20). Still consistent, but the wrong way around.
RE: Repeat analysis - Len - 08-20-2009 05:21 PM
(08-20-2009 09:58 AM)Frank Wrote:(08-18-2009 09:18 PM)Frank Wrote: my eliminated list now is..
2 11 14 15 16 18 19 23 24 27 28 30 37 38 41 42 43 44 45 48. Lets see if this list becomes a bankers list instead.
Result.......10,23,26,30,41,45 bonus 49
Match 4 again ! (compared with 2.45 for random selection of 20). Still consistent, but the wrong way around.
Hi Frank
The list did well again Mate!
I see 26 draws back it had three numbers
i.e. Draw 1399: 10,30,45
25 draws back had number 41
RE: Repeat analysis - Frank - 08-20-2009 08:42 PM
(08-20-2009 05:21 PM)Len Wrote:(08-20-2009 09:58 AM)Frank Wrote:(08-18-2009 09:18 PM)Frank Wrote: my eliminated list now is..
2 11 14 15 16 18 19 23 24 27 28 30 37 38 41 42 43 44 45 48. Lets see if this list becomes a bankers list instead.
Result.......10,23,26,30,41,45 bonus 49
Match 4 again ! (compared with 2.45 for random selection of 20). Still consistent, but the wrong way around.
Hi Frank
The list did well again Mate!
I see 26 draws back it had three numbers
i.e. Draw 1399: 10,30,45
25 draws back had number 41
Its interesting that (from the ones I mentioned) skips of 187 and 189 both repeated number 10, whilst skips of 3 and 838 both repeated number 26. The others skips failed to repeat this time.
Regarding the skip of 26 matching a triple, it should on average happen about every 57 draws for any skip value, but with this particular skip, a triple hasnt repeated for 177 draws, so it was overdue for one. Looking for skips overdue to repeat a triple is another unexplored area of research.